8 Reasons Why The Next Missionary You Support Should Be A Cessationist – Part 1

As my coworker and I walked down the muddy trail, working intently on the very difficult Kuman language, a young man approached us. “Wagai We!” he yelled. In case you need it later, this means “hello” in the Chimbu Province of Papua New Guinea. We exchanged pleasantries and immediately got down to business.

“Why are you here?” he asked.


I’ll spare you the painfully long exchange, but we went on to describe that we were there to learn their language and culture so we could teach them God’s Talk and translate it into their mother tongue. “i wagai. na ama Papa God ka kaungo yomba mocha,” he responded. What he meant, of course, was, “I am a pastor too.” Then, without hesitation, he told us all that his ministry entails: He banished bad ancestral spirits for people when they built new houses. God gave him special power words. Sometimes he used Bible verses to get rid of the evil spirits, and he had special access to the spirit-realm. This, apparently, was his entire ministry — he did sorcery in a suit and tie.

Continuationism is the (very) common belief that the sign and wonder gifts, such as prophetic utterances, miraculous healing, and spontaneous tongues, are still legitimately given, by the Holy Spirit, to Christians today — even though the Apostles of the first Century are dead.

I’ll be blunt: the sign gifts no longer have purpose in our time and have completely ceased. The Bible clearly affirms cessationism, and this is the strongly-held conviction at ThingsAbove.Us. Yes, God does miracles and is providentially working in our world; the Holy Spirit is working to bring the propositions of God’s Word to believers’ minds for application. He seals; He’s the down-payment; He gives us spiritual vibrancy and illuminates the Scriptures; He sanctifies and equips us for the Christian life.

The cessationist still affirms that the Spirit has a crucial role in the Christian life, but His ministry is Christ-centered. Now that we have the inspired writings of the Apostles and the canon is shut God speaks to His people exclusively through the Word. As Justin Peters says so eloquently (and not often enough if you ask me): “If you want to hear God speak, read the Bible. If you want to hear God speak audibly, read it out loud.”

My goal in this series isn’t to debate continuationism. There are lots of able-bodied men who write and speak much more clearly and eloquently here and here. My purpose, actually, is to show why it isn’t just ideal, but essential for local churches to support and send missionaries who absolutely affirm Sola Scriptura — not just in word only, but in practice. This series is primarily to convince those who already affirm that Scripture alone is the Christian’s rubric for life that your church’s next missionary should be a cessationist. This series is for those who would affirm with us that the sign gifts were for the era of the Apostles only. I’m hoping to convince these people that by sending or supporting missionaries that allow for sign gifts in this era, they’re playing with fire.

Belief in continuationism is a much bigger deal than many of us may readily admit. As Fred Butler wrote a few weeks ago, “One may affirm doctrinal orthodoxy, but continuationism will begin distorting not only orthodoxy, but one’s life and practice as a believer.”  He’s right. If Scripture’s sufficiency is only given lip-service, meanwhile, everyone’s actually waiting for “the good stuff,” like random “words from God,” leadings, and speculations, you have a dangerous situation on your hands.

Unbiblical notions about tongues, prophecy, healing, and words from God are harmful to churches in the United States, yes, absolutely. No argument here. But unbiblical notions about tongues, prophecy, healing, and words from God are especially harmful in 3rd-world contexts. Continuationism tears at the fabric of the Western church. Its results can be horrifying. Please understand, however, that continuationism absolutely shreds churches in places like the jungles of Papua New Guinea, and quickly. These churches are indistinguishable from sorcery-ridden witch houses.

It’s bad enough when the indigenous church produces its own people who diminish the authority of Scripture, but exporting Western missionaries who have much more money, much nicer clothes, and weigh a few extra pounds is especially harmful.

In the coming weeks here, I’ll explain exactly why cessationism is so incredibly essential in cross-cultural ministry. Let’s put it this way: if it’s critical in a largely materialistic society like the United States, it’s infinitely more critical in a society filled with spirit-manipulation, power words, and sorcery.

A few notes: I know many wonderful Christian missionaries who would say they still believe sign gifts exist for the church today. I was glad to know them, and glad they were in the field. The reason? They couldn’t promote or use them. The organization we served with worked hard to screen for tongue-speakers and miracle-workers for fear that they would teach and practice these things among the unreached. The continuationists I rubbed shoulders with from time to time slipped through the cracks because, well, they were adept at keeping it quiet. They were continuationist in name, but cessationist in function. Had to be.

This begs the question, then: If you’re a missionary that firmly believes the sign gifts are still given to local churches today, but are careful not to practice tongues or prophecy with your people because of your peoples’ Animistic background, what gives? If it’s the truth, why hide from it? Why not find a different organization that will give you the green light to try some of them? If a church in Columbia functions just fine without tongues, raising people from the dead, snake-handling, and future-predictions, what does that say about these sign gifts? More importantly, what does that say about the Word of God?

Let’s say it together: it’s sufficient.

In this multi-part series, we’ll look at eight (or more, we’ll see) reasons why the missionaries you support should affirm Sola Scriptura in both word and practice. Here they are; click the link to read them:

  1. Sola Scriptura demolishes the Animistic worldview and syncretism, but continuationism promotes it.
  2. Sola Scriptura excites believers toward reading God’s Word, Continuationism stunts literacy.
  3. Sola Scriptura gives clarity to the church’s purpose and its equipping. Continuationism stunts discipleship and evangelistic efforts.
  4. Sola Scriptura fosters order and holds leaders accountable. Continuationism is destructive to church leadership.
  5. Sola Scriptura works missionaries and church planters out of a job. Continuationism promotes paternalism.
  6. Continuationism promotes a bad understanding of the missionary calling
  7. Sola Scriptura promotes a believer’s assurance, which is crucial to a vibrant Christian life. Continuationism hampers assurance.
  8. Sola Scriptura creates a clear impasse between Catholicism and Christianity. Continuationism gives the two common ground. 

Finally, one last point of order: before you barge into the next missionary committee meeting like Rambo or drop your missionaries LIKE TOM BRADY DROPPED THIS PASS, recognize that this may be a beautiful opportunity to draw close to these folks that live in a totally different culture, who likely feel completely isolated from friends and family. You have a special opportunity here. Use these points for your own growth and understanding, but also use them as fodder for a future conversation with the missionaries you love.

Part 2 will be coming shortly.

15 thoughts on “8 Reasons Why The Next Missionary You Support Should Be A Cessationist – Part 1”

  1. Excellent. Looking forward to it. You said “This begs the question, then: If you’re a missionary that firmly believes the sign gifts are still given to local churches today, but are careful not to practice tongues or prophecy with your people because of your peoples’ Animistic background, what gives? If it’s the truth, why hide from it?”

    I wrote this post https://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2017/03/04/divine-revelation-or-wisdomintuition/ in regard to that specific question.

  2. As I examined Church History, I have come to the conclusion that every movement promoting ongoing special revelation from God has been destructive to the Church.

  3. how can the Bible clearly teach cessationism – when the Bible was written, the apostles were still alive.
    It is not eloquent to claim that reading the Bible out loud allows us to hear the voice of God. That is simply a very poor play on words, at best.
    Foundational sacrifices have existed since time immemorial, across cultures. why label this young pastor as a sorceror when he may actually be struggling, not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers?
    devotion to sports promotes pugilistic attitudes. why so combative?

  4. As I dont fully understand “Cessionism” but rather do comprehend the closest term I know as “Supercessionism”, one that I believe embraces the Gospel of Grace by the acceptance of Jesus’ atonement on Calvary whereby God’s introduction of Grace to those who would believe replaced or “superceded” the Torah and it’s strict adherence of laws in the old Covenant with God’s Grace. The Covenant of salvation through Christ’s propitiation for sin led to God providing to all who truly repent and call Jesus Christ their Lord and Saviours as the redemptive way of our being acceptable into His Fathers House. Grace did not end the day Christ ascended but to some it would seem as though they believe God decreased the flow of Grace to followers of Christ by placing limits on what Christ promised His Followers. He made it known in John 14 that our having a relationship with God isn’t complete until we believe all of Christ’s teachings including His assurance and promise of the Holy Spirit being sent to indwell and work in us. He assured His followers they wouldn’t be left as Orphans. He even made it clear in John 14 that the one who is coming will allow them to do “even greater things than these” as well, admittedly a hard thing to comprehend! Now if when He promised this He meant only those who walked with Him when He was in the flesh would be able to do these greater things there leaves the problem of a potential omission in God’s word as to that timely limitation. As God doesn’t make omissions that simply cannot be. As the purpose of the Gospel is to gain a right relationship with God the Father through the life, lessons and atonement of the Son it is by Christ’s assurances that by the power of the Holy Spirit t we sinful creatures can be stirred to repent and ask Christ to be our one and only redeemer. Being in the flesh we wouldn’t do that against our sinful nature without the intercession of the Holy Spirit. We know we are to repent of our sins and be baptized by both the Holy Spirit and the Living Water so to accept a message of limiting the one Christ sent could be errantly interpreted. Along with the understanding that in addition to God the Son the indwelling of God the Holy Spirit is paramount not just for the work of salvation but as a means of discernment of Truth in our daily lives, hence the name given by Christ, The Spirit of Truth. As an annointed Disciple of Christ who is careful to be conservative with God’s word and who tries hard to be liberal with His love I cringe whenever the use of worldly analogies are chosen to explain God’s inerrent Word.

    • Supercessionism is replacement theology, i.e. the Church replaces Israel. Continuationism/cessationism deals primarily with the Apostolic sign gifts and whether or not they continue in this era.

  5. Please get “begging the question” right. To beg the question is a logical fallacy that means to assume the answer within your initial premise. You mean “raises the question.”

  6. A good example of a ‘Straw Man’ argument. The existence of a ‘pastor’ whose only ministry is exorcism is clearly wrong. On the other hand if the church is not equipped to exorcise, we will not be ready for mission.

    Animism – that there are local spirits – is not denied by the bible. Syncretism is. To conflate the two is misleading.

    ‘Continuationism promotes paternalism’. It shouldn’t do; indeed the dependence of the individual on direct contact with God without the missionary being interpreter is healthier!

    ‘Continuationism hampers assurance.’ Really? When believers see God intervene in their lives that HAMPERS assurance?

    Overall a poor article that shows no real engagement with the opposing view. I suggest you find yourself a well educated Nigerian Anglican to bounce your ideas off; they will NOT be impressed.

    • I appreciate your feedback, but, as I wrote: “This series is for those who would affirm with us that the sign gifts were for the era of the Apostles only. I’m hoping to convince these people that by sending or supporting missionaries that allow for sign gifts in this era, they’re playing with fire.” I didn’t engage with the opposing view because, well, that wasn’t my point. As I wrote in the article though, others have.

  7. My “cessationist” friends in Christ, please reconsider this. To say that so-called continuationist churches cannot be distinguished from “witch-houses” is a slander. It’s ugly and saddening.

    The answer for your concerns is the same answer as obtained in the church at Corinth and the other churches of the New Testament: that elders and spiritually mature believers exercise discernment (and also the spiritual gift of diakrisis pneumaton) to regulate their assemblies.

    • Nick, unfortunately, in 3rd world countries, it is absolutely true that continuationist churches cannot be distinguished from witch houses. This is not slander, but the truth. Not only is continuationism unbiblical, but it seamlessly fits into cultures already obsessed with visions, dreams, end of the world prophecies, and mindless babbling.

      • As someone who also served in PNG with NTM, I wholeheartedly agree. To have allowed this unbiblical teaching in Inaru (Bahinimo language group, Sepik PNG) would have been immeasurably destructive to the church there, especially a young struggling church as it was!
        Thank you for writing this! It’s not a popular truth today in this day of confusion and deception.

        • Thanks for reading, as well as your extremely important input Chris. When I get some time here, I’d love to email you some follow up questions. BTW: Jeff Ryder taught me in Bible School (Waukesha).

          • Sure, any time Justin.
            I’m not that far from you as I live in Streator. I would be open to even meeting with you sometime.
            My church here, New Beginnings Baptist, is currently looking for a pastor and I would ask that you keep us in your prayers in this regard.
            Yes. I knew the Ryder’s. They were in Malaumanda at the time.

Leave a Comment