• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Things Above Us

Missions - Evangelism - Theology - Sports

  • About TAU
    • Our Mission
    • The Gospel of Grace
    • Writers
    • Contact Us
    • Comment Policy
    • Attribution/Content Usage Policy
  • Resources
    • Before the Throne
    • From Death to Life
    • Our Tract
  • Articles/Blog Posts
    • Missions
    • Evangelism
    • Theology
    • Sports
    • Book Reviews
    • Kid’s Book Reviews
    • pSaturday Psalms
    • Movie Reviews
    • Go Therefore!
    • Something to Think About
  • Things Above Us Roundtable
  • Evangelio de Cristo
  • Store
    • Cart

From Whose Interpretation Comes No Prophecy? (2 Peter 1:20)

March 13, 2018 by Garrett O’Hara

bible with thick-framed eyeglasses lying atop

2 Peter 1:20 is a difficult verse to interpret, as it has many things going on which don’t easily translate into English. Moreover, one’s own theological leanings and the choices of Bible translators may cause an average reader immediately to prefer a certain interpretation without even becoming aware of an interpretation problem. Moreover, this interpretation problem has a few dimensions to it because several words in the original language could be taken two or more ways.

The Difficulties

It may be fair to say that the “hinge” on which the interpretation problem rotates is the referent of ἰδίας (idias). Generally translated “one’s own,” we must ask the question of who this “one” is: the prophet who records Scripture, a reader of Scripture, or the prophecy itself.[1]  Various translations convey various solutions within the translation itself. Even the usually formal NASB makes an interpretive decision here.

ESV — knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation.

CSB17 —Above all, you know this: No prophecy of Scripture comes from the prophet’s own interpretation,

NASB95 — But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation,

NET — Above all, you do well if you recognize this: No prophecy of scripture ever comes about by the prophet’s own imagination,

NIV2011— Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things.

KJV — Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

Second, ἐπιλύσεως (epiluseōs) is a hapax legomenon[2] within the New Testament, though the use of ἐπιλύω (epiluō) in Mark 4:34 appears to be a potential parallel. This word group originally referred to “a setting free from something,” but it later came to be “the act or process of explaining, explanation, interpretation.”[3] Michael Green argues for authentication (as in that of the Holy Spirit).[4]

Third, γίνεται (ginetai) is an interpretation issue which most translations gloss over. NASB, again breaking from its usual “formal” method, places “a matter” in italics to indicate a gloss for readability. NET and NIV2011—more strictly to the general use of the word—translate “comes about” and “came about,” respectively.

Proposed Solutions

Although there are more interpretations than we can examine here, we can examine the three most often supported. As we stated before that ἰδίας (idias) appears to be the hinge on which the interpretations vary, we will examine the three options for ἰδίας (idias) and how the surrounding context is affected.

First, if ἰδίας (idias) refers to the prophet who wrote the Scripture, then the verse argues that Scripture came about not by the interpretation (alternatively, imagination[5]) of the prophet but rather by the movement of the Holy Spirit. Interpreters with strong affection for the doctrine of inspiration will be inclined to choose this option, as it meshes well with the description of inspiration in the following verse. This understanding comes out explicitly in some translations.[6] Though this meshes well with 1:21, it makes for a more difficult time with γίνεται, as it can no longer be understood in the most common progressive present force (i.e. “is coming about.”)[7] While some also raise concern that ἐπίλυσις (epilusis, “interpretation”) gets stretched here, this usage fits the general semantic domain. Moreover, in the case of such a word of which we only have one usage in the entire New Testament, deference should be given to the immediate context of the word’s usage.

Second, if ἰδίας (idias) refers to the individual reader of scripture, then ἐπιλύσεως (epiluseōs) now refers to the individual interpretation of the reader, and γίνεται (ginetai, “comes about”) retains its common progressive present force. Roman Catholic apologists, in particular, have a certain incentive towards this option in that it appears to reject individuals’ interpretation of Scripture.[8] If verse 20 simply stood alone, this understanding would appear to make the most grammatical sense. However, the conjunction γὰρ (gar, “for”) in v. 21 indicates reason, and it does not mesh well to say, “No prophecy of Scripture comes from private interpretation because the Holy Spirit moved Scripture’s human authors.” (contra Schreiner[9])

Third, if ἰδίας (idias) refers to the prophecy itself, the same issue as the “individual reader” interpretation occurs in verse 21.

I conclude that Peter is referring to the prophets who wrote the Scripture. Not only does it mesh best with its immediate context in verse 21, but it also provides the most solid basis for Peter’s assertions beginning in chapter 2. In short, real prophecy—such as Scripture—comes from God Himself. False prophecy comes from the sensuality (2:2) and greed (2:3) of these false prophets. Translated for this interpretation, we should take this and the following verse as “knowing this first: that no prophecy of Scripture comes from the prophet’s own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but by the Holy Spirit men spoke from God.”

[1] Note on 2 Pet 1:20 in The NET Bible, 1st ed. Accordance ed. (Biblical Studies Press, 2009).

[2] A word that appears only once, which means it’s more difficult to figure out what the word means.

[3] BDAG, 375.

[4] Michael Green, 2 Peter and Jude: An Introduction and Commentary, ed. Leon Morris, 2nd ed. Accordance ed., The Tyndale New Testament commentaries 18 (Grand Rapids, Mich: Intervarsity Press, 1987), 111.

[5] 2 Pet 1:20, NET.

[6] CSB, NET, NIV2011, NLT.

[7] See Daniel B Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament, Accordance ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 518.

[8] Note on 2 Pet 1:20 in The NET Bible, 1st ed. Accordance ed. (Biblical Studies Press, 2009).

[9] Thomas R. Schreiner, 1, 2 Peter, Jude, Logos ed., The New American Commentary 37 (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2003), 322–323.

Garrett O’Hara

Garrett O’Hara

Garrett appears to have originated the term, but not the theology, "dispybapticalvinistic-expialidocious." He is a husband, a father of four children, a U.S. Navy veteran, a semi-truck driver, and a second grade Sunday school teacher. He also holds a Th.M. in New Testament paid for mostly by the Post-9/11 GI Bill (don't tell Mikey Weinstein).

Filed Under: Theology Tagged With: 2 Peter, exegesis, prophecy, sola scriptura

Liked what you read? Subscribe!


Views expressed in posts are those of their individual authors and may not be shared by all writers on Things Above Us.

Primary Sidebar

On Sale Now

  • From Death to Life $14.99 $13.99
  • Before the Throne $17.00 $14.99

Subscribe To Things Above Us

Sign up for our RSS newsfeed and stay up-to-date with the latest blog posts on Things Above Us!

Things Above Us Roundtable

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | Google Play | Stitcher | Email | RSS

Pull up a chair to the TAU Roundtable as the writers from ThingsAbove.Us and other special guests discuss current events, theology, missions, evangelism, and sports!

The Bible Memory App - Bible Memory Verses
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Go, Therefore: Family Worship
  • “Antiracism” Deserves a Capital Letter: A Preview of Voddie Baucham’s Fault Lines
  • Rightly Understanding John 3:16
  • 2 Peter 1 in the Legacy Standard Bible
  • 5 Reasons Baptist Churches Should Associate

The Team

Garrett O’HaraGarrett O’Hara

Garrett appears to have originated the term, but not the theology, "dispybapticalvinistic-expialidocious." He ...

“Antiracism” Deserves a Capital Letter: A Preview of Voddie Baucham’s Fault Lines
Michael CoughlinMichael Coughlin

Michael Coughlin lives near Columbus, OH, and leads local outreaches to glorify our Lord and reach the lost with...

Go, Therefore: Family Worship
George AlvaradoGeorge Alvarado

George Alvarado is an almost retired member of our Armed Forces (yes, he's older than he looks). He has a beautiful w...

A Open Letter to Afflicted Saints
Tim BatesTim Bates

Tim lives in Akron, Ohio with his wife, Melanie and two children, Calvin and Caroline. He serves as a deacon, teacher...

Reflections on a World Without Sports
Allen Nelson IVAllen Nelson IV

Allen S. Nelson IV is the pastor of Perryville Second Baptist Church in Perryville, Arkansas. He and his wife Steph...

Rightly Understanding John 3:16
Chuck IveyChuck Ivey

By God’s grace, Chuck Ivey grew up in a Christian home and came to know Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior at a y...

The Living Logos and True Mythos: A Response to “Satanic Panics and the Death of Mythos”

Click a term to see related posts.

Adoption atonement Bible book review Cessationism children Christ Christian Life Christmas Chuck Ivey church conversion Culture Devotional discipleship evangelism Foster Care From death to life Genesis gospel grace imputation Jesus Justification local church love Marriage mercy NFL preaching Psalm 119 Psalms reformed baptist Reformed Baptist Theology reformed theology Roundtable sanctification scripture sin sola scriptura Something To Think About Suffering theology Things Above Us worship

Click the image below if you got one of these cards.

Other Posts You May Like…

Open Letter to Brothers

A post came across my feed last week, and I appreciate the courage to post something like this. It was an open letter from a godly Christian wife to her Christian husband who is not leading as he ought. I messaged Michelle Lesley (who had posted the letter), and I told her it was sad that […]

Balaam and His Donkey as a Historical Event

In the 22nd chapter of the book of Numbers, we find the story of Balaam and his talking donkey. I want us to think of this portion of Scripture as a piece of actual history. We hear about beasts of burden speaking to humans and we get the urge to chalk this up as a […]

No, We Do Not Need to Own Hitler

1 You can hardly visit a social media thread/debate without seeing the commission of countless logical fallacies. The level at which unregenerate people and immature/uneducated Christians commit logical fallacies is only eclipsed by their perceived mastery of them. Something I have observed is that many people accuse other of fallacious reasoning when there really is not […]

TAU Roundtable logo with a gravestone left and lady praying on right

Ep. 031 | 2020 NFL Playoffs Predictions — TAU Roundtable

Jason, Michael, Timmm, and special guest Nicholas Coughlin discuss the NFL playoffs. Predictions and hot takes are made. If you enjoy the NFL you will want to listen in to this playoff preview.  

Giveaway and Review: The Pilgrim’s Progress

Movie Review I count it a great privilege that bloggers are asked to review movies and books. It gives me an opportunity to preview things before the general public, and in many cases, I probably wouldn’t spend the money, so it allows me to enjoy something I otherwise wouldn’t enjoy. Stay with me for my […]

Something to think about!

Arminian Hopelessness: STTA!

Something To Think About! The Arminian doctrine which denies the perseverance of the saints (in order that man’s “free-will” may remain sovereign and autonomous) is detestable to the people of God. A God who would hold you in His bosom against your own will is not a God that the unregenerate mind can worship. Free-willers and […]

2018 © Things Above Us

Copyright © 2021 · Things Above Us on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in